Is it quantum entanglement a manifestation of a fourth spacial dimension?



The way to the NBA's championship ring is long and tortuous, and I occasionally get bored about the topic of  basketball. For that reason I sometimes speak of themes that are not related to this sport. On the current occasion I'm going to talk about that curious happening that is produced, for example, when two particles like a positron and an electron collide, creating two photons entangled

They are like two elements associated, so that when one has a feature, the other appears with the contrary feature. For example if ones has spin up ๐Ÿ‘†, the other appears with spin down ๐Ÿ‘‡, like happens with electrons. Spin is a characteristic related to a behavior of a particle under a magnetic field.

On the image above we can see a representation of an hypercube, a cube with for dimensions. I have found that opposite faces, the ones that are on the extremes, are the same although they are away one of other. So two opposite red cubes, 1 and 2 are the same. So for example if a person got out of cube by 1 side is like it was entering by 2 side. So an observer in 1 would say, the person is going out of the hypercube, but an observer on 2 would say that is entering on the hypercube. The same happens with entangled particles, if one has spin up the other has spin down. Why? because they are the same particle but on four spacial dimension. When we see two particles entangled really are the same particle on other dimension.

In my opinion, this resolves the mystery of the entangled particles and the spooky action at a distance that Einstein said.

Note: this is not a theory proved, they are guesses.

For more detail information about quantum entanglement and the relation between the spin of the particles entangled you can see the following video of the channel "Fermilab". It explains graphically how one spins depends of the others. The physicist on the video, Dr. Don Lincoln, defines quantum entanglement as "two subatomic particles that share the same wave function."

 


Comments